Monday, 20 February 2017

Richard Bagdasarian Attorney – Lawsuits Will Be Critical in Protecting People’s Rights over Next Four Years

Lawsuits Will Be Critical in Protecting People’s Rights over Next Four Years

lawsuit3-200x200

As the U.S. prepares to welcome in a new administration, advocacy groups are predicting that litigation will be key in protecting citizens’ civil rights under state and federal commercial laws, including consumer protection and employment laws.

Because it is anticipated that there will be fewer opportunities to collaborate with the administration before certain laws and regulations are put in place, some advocacy organizations have said that the courts will, specifically, serve as “an important bulwark.” This will be especially important in upholding constitutional rights.

Potential Threats

Specifically, constitutional law scholars are concerned about the following being eviscerated:

  • First Amendment Rights: The First Amendment protects the rights of free speech and press, including the rights of journalists to be able to report candidly;
  • Equal Protection of the Laws: S. citizens have the right to be treated equally, regardless of their religious upbringing, affiliation, beliefs, race, gender, etc.;
  • Separation of Powers: It is crucial that the judicial branch remain independent as part of our system of separated checks and balances; and
  • Voting Rights & Civil Rights: It is critical that the voting rights of all Americans are protected.

Recent Civil Rights Case

Commonwealth v. Warren, a recent case taken up by the Massachusetts Supreme Court, examined whether police had reasonable suspicion to stop an African-American man simply because he ran away from officers. It had already been established by the courts that evasive conduct in the absence of any other information tending toward an individualized suspicion that a defendant is involved in a crime is insufficient to support reasonable suspicion. Specifically, the law guards a person’s freedom to speak or not to speak to a police officer. It is also within someone’s right to simply wall away and avoid contact with police. In other words; there is a fine line between consensual and obligatory police encounters.

The court concluded that because African-American men are disproportionately and repeatedly subject to police stops, more is needed to establish reasonable suspicion than the officers had in this particular case, especially given that African-Americans often have reasons to flee and these reasons may be “unrelated to the consciousness of guilt.” A report recently compiled concerning the incidence of African-American men in the city likely being targeted for police-civilian encounters such as stops, frisks, searches, interrogations, etc. played a large part in the decision.

These are the types of cases that we are likely to see come up in court over the next four years.

Civil Litigators Handling both Private and Public Legal Issues

The attorneys at Lavalle, Brown & Ronan, P.A. have a combined 130 years of experience working in civil and commercial law in the Boca Raton area. If you have been involved in a dispute, or suffered from a personal injury, including a violation of your civil rights, contact us today at 561-395-0000 or online to receive a free legal consultation. We are here to serve the citizens of Boca Raton and surrounding communities.

For more information and in depth analysis, please contact Attorney Ken Ronan at   kronan@bocalaw.com and Case Manager Richard Bagdasarian at rbagdasarian@bocalaw.com.


Richard Bagdasarian Attorney


Resource:

theguardian.com/us-news/2016/dec/23/civil-rights-trump-era-courts-lawsuit-ziglar-vs-abbasi-aclu




source https://richardbagdasarian.wordpress.com/2017/02/20/richard-bagdasarian-attorney-lawsuits-will-be-critical-in-protecting-peoples-rights-over-next-four-years/

Friday, 17 February 2017

Richard Bagdasarian Attorney – Florida Supreme Court Questions Whether State Medical Malpractice Law Violates Patient Privacy

Florida Supreme Court Questions Whether State Medical Malpractice Law Violates Patient Privacy

malpractice-200x200

On December 8th, the Florida Supreme Court reviewed a case that could have repercussions for victims of medical malpractice who choose to bring malpractice lawsuits here in Florida. The case centers around a 2013 state medical malpractice law that allows what are known as “ex parte communications,” or communications between attorneys and doctors who have treated the patients involved in the lawsuits, but concerning issues that are completely unrelated to the malpractice allegations. Many have argued that the law deters people from bringing medical malpractice lawsuits in general due to privacy and disclosure concerns, as one justice described it, leading to a “chilling effect.”

What’s frightened many—including the Supreme Court justices—about the law is just how private medical information is, and how important maintaining that guarantee of privacy is in order for doctors to be able to properly and effectively treat their patients.

Constitutional Right to Privacy

The Florida Constitution guarantees privacy rights to citizens. Specifically, it declares that every natural person has the right to be let alone and free from intrusion into their private life. In addition, the court, not the state legislature, is the typically the branch authorized to make decisions concerning ex parte communications. In this sense, the Florida state legislature arguably overstepped its boundaries when it passed this law in 2013.

Federal Judge Previously Strikes Part of Law

In 2013—soon after the law was passed—a federal judge threw out that portion of the law that allowed defendant health care providers and their representatives to have these ex parte communications with the plaintiff’s doctors, indicating that it violated the federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (Act). Specifically, the judge found that the state law’s requirement that the defendant have ex parte access to the plaintiff’s medical providers did not constitute “voluntary permission,” as required under the Act, and that this statute was an attempt to circumvent federal requirements.

The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)

HIPAA not only protects health insurance coverage for workers and their families in the event of losing or changing jobs, but it also requires that national standards be established when it comes to electronic healthcare transactions. Perhaps most importantly, its privacy rule requires covered entities to take all reasonable steps to ensure the confidentiality of communication. For example, hospitals can’t even reveal information over the phone to relatives of admitted patients.

Medical Malpractice & Civil Litigation Attorneys Serving Florida

When you have the victim of medical malpractice—or your civil rights have been violated—the law offices of Lavalle Brown & Ronan can help. Our Boca Raton attorneys have years of experience representing clients in and around Boca Raton with personal injury claims and civil litigation. Contact us today for a free consultation.

For more information and in depth analysis, please contact Attorney Ken Ronan at   kronan@bocalaw.com and Case Manager Richard Bagdasarian at rbagdasarian@bocalaw.com.


Richard Bagdasarian Attorney


Resources:

news4jax.com/news/florida/supreme-court-questions-medical-malpractice-law

flsenate.gov/Laws/Constitution#A1S23

floridabar.org/divcom/jn/jnnews01.nsf/8c9f13012b96736985256aa900624829/47c561f31b9d44dc85257bfd0046ab7c!OpenDocument

leg.state.fl.us/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&URL=0700-0799/0766/Sections/0766.106.html




source https://richardbagdasarian.wordpress.com/2017/02/17/richard-bagdasarian-attorney-florida-supreme-court-questions-whether-state-medical-malpractice-law-violates-patient-privacy/

Wednesday, 15 February 2017

Richard Bagdasarian Attorney – New Study Highlights Toxins in Baby Pacifiers

New Study Highlights Toxins in Baby Pacifiers

pacifier-200x200

A new study just released by the American Chemical Society found that the most popular teething rings contain hormone-disrupting chemicals and toxins linked to an increased risk of developing cancer, obesity, and heart disease. Although the teethers were found to contain these harmful substances—including Bisphenol A (BPA), Bisphenol S, Bisphenol F, parabens, and antimicrobials (such as triclosan and triclocarban)—many of the products were advertised as “BPA-free” or “non-toxic.” The teethers were also found to leach chemicals into water, which is similar to the composition of baby saliva.

In addition to being linked to cancer and heart disease, these chemicals can also affect IQ levels and cause neurological and behavioral disorders, such as ADHD and autism. While some of the chemicals are regulated individually, little is known about the accumulation of multiple endocrine-disrupting chemicals, and many are still completely unregulated, even though they can harm people when used in products.

The Dangers

Parabens are reportedly used in teethers that contain water or gel in order to prevent the growth of microorganisms; along with antimicrobials triclosan and triclocarban, they were banned for use by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) because of their ability to cause bacterial resistance and hormonal effects. Based on the FDA’s studies, parabens were found to be the most commonly leached of the chemicals.

According to experts, about 90 percent of Americans have BPA in their bodies, indicating that the chemical is still prevalent even though the FDA banned the use of BPA in baby bottles and sippy cups in 2012. While the plastics industry has responded that the levels of BPA used in other baby products are too low to present a health risk, recent studies have indicated that even at the microgram or nanogram level, they can cause harm. FDA researchers are especially concerned about those who are most vulnerable, including young children; not only are they vulnerable, but they are a particularly difficult demographic to study. Scientists typically have to rely on insight gained from animal-based studies in order to make predictions about how a chemical will affect a young child.

What also concerns researchers is the combination of all these individually-studied chemicals; specifically, that putting together this “cocktail of chemicals, even in low amounts, during the critical stages of development, can have an effect in many stages of life.” Even though, in our everyday lives, we are exposed to chemicals mixed with other chemicals, there is a research void in that these substances are typically tested individually.

Labeling Concerns

In addition to concerns over the combination of chemicals and the effects they can have on toddlers throughout their lives, the researchers were also understandably concerned about the fact that these products were labeled “non-toxic.” The products themselves can be toxic under some circumstances, especially when used in unanticipated ways, such as if someone applies a certain amount of heat in using the product.

Personal Injury & Product Liability Attorneys Protecting Consumers

If you or a loved one has been injured by a product that contains harmful substances, contact one of our experienced personal injury attorneys at Lavalle, Brown & Ronan right away to find out what your options are. We serve clients in Boca Raton and the surrounding areas.

For more information and in depth analysis, please contact Attorney Ken Ronan at   kronan@bocalaw.com and Case Manager Richard Bagdasarian at rbagdasarian@bocalaw.com.


Richard Bagdasarian Attorney


Resources:

foxnews.com/health/2016/12/07/baby-teethers-may-contain-low-levels-bpa-study-finds.html

pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/acs.est.6b04128




source https://richardbagdasarian.wordpress.com/2017/02/15/richard-bagdasarian-attorney-new-study-highlights-toxins-in-baby-pacifiers/

Monday, 13 February 2017

Richard Bagdasarian Attorney – New Rules Aimed At Reducing Slip and Fall Accidents Could Leave Employers Liable

New Rules Aimed At Reducing Slip and Fall Accidents Could Leave Employers Liable

slipfall-200x200

New rules finalized by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), which will go into effect on January 17th of the new year, require all employers to take stringent steps to prevent slip and fall accidents. While the construction industry has long been dealing with such requirements, these rules now essentially apply to all training, use, and maintenance of protective equipment in the workplace.

Fall hazards are reportedly the leading cause of worker deaths and injuries every year. In order to address this issue, OSHA designed the new rules to focus on establishing new requirements for working surfaces, floors, ladders, roofs, scaffolds, stairways, walkways, and related areas. OSHA estimates that they will impact more than 110 million workers employed at seven million worksites, preventing close to 6,000 injuries and 30 fatalities each year.

Changes & Employer Requirements

The new rules will require employers to select a fall protection program and comply with revised requirements for portable and fixed ladders. They also prohibit the use of body belts as part of the personal fall arrest systems. Fall protection options include safety nets, guardrails, positioning systems, travel restraints, handrails, and several other options.

Employers must also ensure that ladders are capable of supporting the “maximum intended load” at a minimum, where maximum intended load equals the total weight and force anticipated to be applied by the employee, equipment, and/or any other materials. All ladders must also be inspected before a work shift, and any portable ladders used must include slip-resistant rungs and steps.

Employers must also provide training to any workers who use personal fall protection equipment or otherwise work under circumstances that could cause them to slip and fall (for example, employees who work on a dock). Training must include the identification of fall hazards and the maintenance, inspection, and storage of any equipment used for fall protection.

How This Could Affect Personal Injury Lawsuits

While these standards were previously only applied to the construction agency, OSHA decided to expand their application to general industries in order to keep up with technological advancement and promote consistency in general.

It is also worth noting that workers’ compensation and personal injury litigation have already served an incentive for some—but not all—employers to implement safety protocols which already comply with these new rules. However, now that these provisions are officially federal requirements, any employers not complying with them are technically breaking the law, and that can affect any personal injury case brought by someone who slips and falls in connection with a violation; in other words, someone who is injured as the result of a slip and fall accident would arguably have an easier time arguing that their employer is liable for their injuries.

Contact an Experienced Slip and Fall Attorney

If you’ve suffered from a slip and fall injury, speaking with an experienced attorney can help you understand if your rights have been violated and you may be entitled to financial compensation. At Lavalle, Brown & Ronan, P.A., our experienced Boca Raton slip and fall lawyers are here to help you understand your rights and develop your case. Contact us today for a free consultation.

For more information and in depth analysis, please contact Attorney Ken Ronan at   kronan@bocalaw.com and Case Manager Richard Bagdasarian at rbagdasarian@bocalaw.com.

Resource:

mhlnews.com/facilities-management/new-osha-slip-fall-rules-impact-employers-all-industries




source https://richardbagdasarian.wordpress.com/2017/02/13/richard-bagdasarian-attorney-new-rules-aimed-at-reducing-slip-and-fall-accidents-could-leave-employers-liable/

Friday, 10 February 2017

Richard Bagdasarian Attorney – Allstate Pays Settlement Linked To Consumer Fraud

Allstate Pays Settlement Linked To Consumer Fraud

fraud3-200x200

 

Both Allstate and the Liberty Mutual Group, Inc. settled with consumers and their attorneys recently for improperly advertising programs related to accident forgiveness. Specifically, the companies had to pay for investigative costs and civil penalties, contributing towards future investigations and prosecutions related to consumer fraud issues like these.

The insurance companies were found to have advertised “accident forgiveness” auto insurance programs, which promised that policyholders’ rates would not increase after their first accident. However, the companies failed to disclose that the program isn’t available in some states–such as California–as these programs have been outlawed by some ballot initiatives, which banned them due to the programs typically coming at the cost of higher premium rates in general.

Misleading Ads

In the case against Allstate, the complaint alleges that the ads convey the overall impression that consumers can qualify for accident forgiveness benefits even though, based on where they live, this is not necessarily the case. Although some of these television advertisements had a small disclaimer at the bottom of the screen, the consumers who brought the lawsuit alleged that this was insufficient to adequately alert viewers when the program was not available in their state. Under the judgement ordered, Allstate is paying $600,000 and Liberty Mutual close to $1,000,000 to settle the lawsuits.

State Consumer Protection Laws

This particular lawsuit was based on the law in California, which requires that all advertising clearly and conspicuously disclose any material facts necessary in order to avoid misleading viewers. Florida has a similar law, stating that no person, corporation, etc. shall disseminate an advertisement which contains any assertion, representation, or statement which is untrue, deceptive, or misleading.

Not only do states have false advertising laws, but also unfair competition laws. Florida has the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act, which declares that unfair methods of competition, unconscionable acts or practices, and unfair or deceptive acts or practices in the conduct of any trade or commerce are unlawful. When ads like these convey that consumers in the state will receive benefits as part of a company’s auto insurance policy when they cannot, that arguably constitutes consumer fraud which falls under these state protection laws.

Experienced Commercial Litigation & Consumer Protection Attorneys

In commercial litigation, consumer fraud is a frequent issue that comes up, and which our attorneys help consumers address. You are protected under federal and state commercial laws from illegal and unfair practices. You and your attorney can also work with the Florida Bureau of Insurance Fraud to investigate alleged acts (in addition to pursuing your claim).

Lavalle, Brown & Ronan, P.A. has a combined record of over 130 years of protecting consumers in Boca Raton and surrounding areas in Florida. Contact our team of experienced attorneys today for a free consultation, and let us help find you a solution for your case.

For more information and in depth analysis, please contact Attorney Ken Ronan at   kronan@bocalaw.com and Case Manager Richard Bagdasarian at rbagdasarian@bocalaw.com.

Resources:

pe.com/articles/accident-819811-california-county.html

leg.state.fl.us/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&Search_String=&URL=0800-0899/0817/Sections/0817.06.html


Richard Bagdasarian Attorney





source https://richardbagdasarian.wordpress.com/2017/02/10/richard-bagdasarian-attorney-allstate-pays-settlement-linked-to-consumer-fraud/

Tuesday, 10 January 2017

Richard Bagdasarian Attorney – When Child Trafficking Victims Are Charged As Adults

Richard Bagdasarian Attorney


When Child Trafficking Victims Are Charged As Adults

arrest_bars-200x200

On November 3rd, the Los Angeles Times highlighted an issue that many are unaware has become problematic today in how we treat juveniles as part of the criminal justice system; specifically, the fact that our system often prosecutes children under the age of 18 who sell themselves for sex as adults, while altogether failing to prosecute those who have trafficked them. Instead of treating them like criminal prostitutes, law enforcement should be treating them as trafficking victims and focus their energy on prosecuting those who are financially profiting from child abuse.

While many communities around the country are concerned about this issue, what few solutions have been offered—such as an enforcing an employment ban anyone who has ever been convicted of a human trafficking offense—by no means get to the heart of the problem. Time and time again, it has been shown that criminal reform depends upon helping those previously convicted of crimes reenter society and make a valuable contribution to it. This is why some counties—such as Los Angeles County—prohibit employers from even asking about previous convictions during the job application stage. In addition, this employment hurdle shows a clear bias against those convicted of some sex crimes but not others, as it is still permissible for other former inmates to earn gainful employment after leaving prison.

A History of Unproductive Discrimination

This approach is similar to what American society did concerning drug crimes a decade ago—making it difficult to impossible for former inmates to find employment after they left prison, leaving them with few options other than returning to a life of crime in order to support themselves. In doing so, they also disproportionately punished certain minority groups and individuals living in poverty. And although we as a society recognized that this did little good, we now appear to be doing the same thing to all of those involved in human trafficking and sex crimes, including the underage victims who have very little choice in the matter.

Unfortunately, Florida appears to be leading the nation in charging juveniles as adults; specifically, between 2009 and 2014, more than 12,000 children were moved from the juvenile to adult court system, and more than 50 percent of them were charged with nonviolent crimes. This is essentially due to Florida’s “direct file statute,” which allows prosecutors to exercise discretion in moving a case from juvenile to adult court without holding a hearing or even receiving input from a judge first.

The report also indicated that young African Americans are disproportionately affected by state law, and make up close to 30 percent of those who enter the juvenile justice system in the first place.

Our Boca Raton Sex Crimes Attorneys Can Help

If you are a juvenile or adult, and have been accused of a sex crime in Boca Raton, Florida, or surrounding areas, we can help. At Lavalle, Brown & Ronan, our attorneys have been providing justice to juveniles wrongfully prosecuted as adults and vilified for years. These crimes are serious, and can change the course of your life, making it difficult to impossible to find employment and reintegrate into society. Contact us today and we’ll provide you with a free consultation, where you’ll have the opportunity to ask questions and discuss your options.

For more information and in depth analysis, please contact Attorney Ken Ronan at   kronan@bocalaw.com and Case Manager Richard Bagdasarian at rbagdasarian@bocalaw.com.

Resources:

msnbc.com/msnbc/florida-charging-kids-adults

latimes.com/opinion/editorials/la-ed-county-ban-human-trafficking-20161102-story.html


Richard Bagdasarian Attorney





source https://richardbagdasarian.wordpress.com/2017/01/10/richard-bagdasarian-attorney-when-child-trafficking-victims-are-charged-as-adults/

Thursday, 29 December 2016

Richard Bagdasarian Attorney – New Documentary Highlights Wrongful Conviction Issues in United States

Richard Bagdasarian Attorney


New Documentary Highlights Wrongful Conviction Issues in United States

advocate-300x196

A new documentary just released—Southwest of Salem: the Story of the San Antonio Four—documents the story of four wrongful convictions during a time of paranoia and homophobia in the United States twenty years ago. The documentary specifically focuses on the use of junk science in convicting these women so many years ago, when they were pulled away from their lives and families due to issues in our criminal justice system that are still very much around.

Although the story of this particular trial is riddled with nightmarish facts, unfortunately, wrongful convictions aren’t that unusual in our criminal justice system. According to a recent study, approximately 10,000 people are wrongfully convicted of serious crimes in the U.S. each year.

Exoneration and Compensation for Victims

Some states have gone so far as to pass laws that allow wrongfully convicted defendants to challenge their convictions when there is new scientific evidence, regardless of where their appeals process is.  Federal law also provides that there be compensation for the wrongfully convicted, and even Florida has a law allowing anyone who was wrongfully convicted to receive $50,000 for each year they were imprisoned (up to a maximum of $2 million), in addition to free college tuition. In Florida, for example, one man was awarded $1.7 million after spending 35 years in prison for a rape conviction that he was cleared of following DNA testing.

However, there is a clause which prevents the state from providing any compensation if the wrongfully convicted has prior felony convictions, and most people who are released from prison after a wrongful conviction have a very difficult time getting the compensation they are due from the state and getting back on their feet again.

Exonerees also have the option of filing a civil suit against the city, state, or authorities that were involved in their wrongful conviction. That may be an option the San Antonio Four pursue, as you must first be exonerated in order to be compensated by the state for being unjustly imprisoned, and yet for these four wrongfully convicted women, the district attorney’s office has not yet supported a finding that the woman are, in fact innocent; just that they are entitled to new trials.

Boca Raton Criminal Defense Attorneys

If you have been accused or convicted of a crime, you need to speak with an experienced criminal defense attorney as soon as possible.

The experienced criminal defense attorneys at Lavalle, Brown & Ronan, P.A. provide a strong defense against criminal charges and work to get the best result possible, from a dismissal of charges or not guilty verdict to favorable plea bargains, probation and alternative sentencing options. Contacting one of our attorneys as soon as possible will help to preserve and protect your rights and position you for the best possible outcome. If you or a loved one has been arrested in Boca Raton or a surrounding area, contact our office for immediate assistance.

Resources:

rollingstone.com/culture/features/southwest-of-salem-san-antonio-four-junk-forensic-science-w444481

researchnews.osu.edu/archive/ronhuff.htm


Richard Bagdasarian Attorney





source https://richardbagdasarian.wordpress.com/2016/12/29/richard-bagdasarian-attorney-new-documentary-highlights-wrongful-conviction-issues-in-united-states/